You have played with the examples the Raspberry Foundation has thoughtfully provided. Now you want to create something on your own! I like the information provided by the Foundation as to how to create a project and how to add easily binary information to the binary code of project. This means you can build a project, write pin information to the binary and then pick up the board weeks(months?) later and determine what is on the board and how to use it.
gdb recommended in its screen feedback to use “target extended-remote :3333” instead of the Guide’s “target remote localhost:3333”. I found that this seemed to solve some of these inconsistencies, so I updated my instructions. After a bit of reading “extended-remote” does seem to be the right instruction. Note: If using Bloom and avr-gdb, extended doesn’t serve a purpose, use target remote:1442.
If you find your self executing a lengthy command quite a bit (such as “monitor reset init”), use “define” to create a shorter command for it. If you put it into the .gdbinit file (as I have), it will remember from session to session.
gdb can be incredibly easy to use. Norman Matloff’s tutorial is great for illustrating the commands needed. I recommend reading and practicing with it, its well worth it!
Start with using gdb to replace printf statements. Run code, have it stop by using a “breakpoint function name” or “breakpoint line number”, then use “print” or “display” to get the values of variables. This will work the same as inserting print statements, however, it doesn’t affect your code.
It took me less time to learn gdb, and write these two tutorials than the time I spent attempting to debug Visual Studio Code. Your mileage may vary, however, a simple gdb/code editor setup is fast and easy to learn and use.
If your code ends, you will see “exit(status=0)….”. To restart the program, simply issue a “mri” (a command from .gdbinit) which will reset the processor. Press “c” and the program will begin running again.
gdb operates in at least two modes:
command, indicated by (gdb) prompt. This is where you will enter all of the commands to interact with gdb
execution, indicated by a lack of a (gdb) prompt. This means the program is running and hitting a breakpoint or watchpoint will return you back to command mode. Or you can hit Ctrl-C which will interrupt the process and put into command mode.
Enter the command layout src or start by using gdb –tui and the window will divide into two horizontal windows. The top window will show 20 lines of source and the bottom window will continue to be the command window. This is a great way to view a breakpoint. For example, set a breakpoint on a function name, then “n(ext)” through the code to view execution. Once you have entered “n”, you can simply hit the return key and it will advance using the next command.
Note found elsewhere, I’ll link to it when I find it: “remember to use -g only for the image you pass to gdb, not the firmware you load into the device (if it can grok elf).
Also another very critical prerequisite for C programs is -O0 (which is usually default). But if you use -Os or something, you can get very unpredictable debugging results.
This btw. makes debugging some code on avrs for example almost impossible, as they often rely on -Os to fit the image in there.
But.. it is very possible and comfy to debug simple optimized C programs in assembly, if you know roughly what to expect.
Use objdump -dS on the optimized .elf file with debugging info and you’ll roughly see what assembly code was produced for what C code.”
The Guide recommends at the very least, add “target remote localhost:3333” to your .gdbinit file. To make our edit/compile/link/load round trip easy, I recommend the following for your .gdbinit:
I like using Forth to develop code on embedded microcontrollers, however at times, I’ll have a project that requires a more supportive framework. In this case, C is a superior choice if I need the execution speed of Forth and the framework of microPython. This requires a significant investment in building the tools required and skills to use those tools, to develop in C.
Now that I have gone through over 20 assemble/link/UF2 cycles, I have a better understanding of what needs to be done, specific to macOS Big Sur.
Follow the comments as to “The process…” particularly as it regards getting macOS to run the ARM toolchain. This has to happen first.
Reduce the complexity of Mecrisp-Stellaris. Matthias has performed a remarkable job in getting so many processors to run this version of Forth. This achievement needs to be applauded and appreciated. That said, unless you are running a significant number of versions, delete those that you aren’t using. In my case, I used the 128k/128K version to determine what was required for the RP2040. This is my base moving forward. NoteIn reviewing version 2.6.5, the new model is 128K/128K from Matthias.
Terry’s directions below (Understatement), however, its even easier. If you have performed point 2, then the solution is simply:
cd mecrisp-stellaris-x.x.x
./release
# put board in USB mode, drag/drop UF2 file and go to work
Really important things to do: (Instructions below)
(With apologies to Terry Porter)
Terry’s page above as Mecrisp Patching was extremely helpful and contained this nugget. Which is true, however, it takes a little bit of additional work to get there with the RP2040.
This entry will be very similar to the one using the RP2040 and MicroPython, the difference will is I will use MSForth instead.
Getting Started
I’m going to assume that the serial connection, Forth installation and the ability to write/edit/run Forth programs on the RP2040 already exists. If not see this entry.
Where I compile interesting notes as to how Mecrisp-Stellaris Forth is implemented on the RP2040 microcontroller.
ALWAYS WRITE SHORT DEFINITIONS!!
I was working on this entry and was attempting to hand-write the definition of PIN_BLINK by keeping the stack in my head. As my definition approached over 10 albeit short lines, it continued to not work. This is when I remembered, Forth is designed to be easy to read and interactive, work with Forth, not against it!
This video, Rail to Rail Op Amps P1 got me thinking as to the issues with the LM358. So to determine if it mattered on my previous amplifier design, I went back and redid the circuit. I used the OP484, as it was an op-amp I had and it is specifically a “Precision Rail-to-Rail Input and Output…”. I thought it would be interesting to do two things:
When developing software for microcontrollers, the longtime standard was the Arduino. It required a modified version of C++, which allowed writing software quite close to the hardware, however, it had two specific issues. One, the language itself is very particular and it is not elegant and two, the compile/load/run (CLR) loop can be laborious and time-consuming.